Law and Climate Change Toolkit

Ttl I

 Title I
 sets out the principles and general provisions applicable to both the strategic environmental assessment and the environmental impact assessment.
 The principles mentioned in the law are not established ex novo, but preexist in the community and national systems. However, their explicit inclusion in the standard has been considered appropriate in order to be very present, summarized and compiled, at the time of taking decisions on environmental assessment and in particular for the communities They shall be taken into consideration if they decide to make use of the constitutional rating enabling them to adopt additional environmental protection rules. These principles are the protection and improvement of the environment; preventive and precautionary action: prevention and correction and compensation of impacts on the environment; the polluter pays; rationalisation; simplification and consultation of environmental assessment procedures; cooperation and coordination between the General Administration of the State and the Autonomous Communities, proportionality between the effects on the environment of the plans, programmes and projects and the type of assessment procedure to which they are to be submitted, if appropriate, active collaboration of the various administrative bodies involved in the evaluation procedure, providing the necessary information required for them, public participation, sustainable development and integration of the aspects environmental in decision making. For environmental assessment legislation to be inspired by these principles and to achieve a high degree of homogeneity among the rules applicable in different parts of the national territory, the law makes a call for cooperation in the framework of the Sectoral Environment Conference, in which the necessary regulatory changes will be analyzed and proposed to comply with the law and, in particular, to promote regulatory changes and reforms. necessary for the amendment, repeal or recasting of the legislation existing autonomy, or the referral to this law, with the provisos that demand their organizational particularities. Within the framework, technical working groups may be set up to develop methodological guidelines for environmental assessment to allow the standardisation of these procedures. This Title I also regulates general issues such as the object and purpose of the rule; definitions; scope; assumptions excluded from environmental assessment and exceptable projects; mandate In order to assess the environmental impact of the environmental assessment, the Commission will be responsible for the implementation of the environmental assessment of the environmental impact assessment and the implementation of the environmental impact assessment. the relationship between administrations; the relationship between the strategic assessment and the environmental impact; the relationship between this and the integrated environmental authorization contained in Law 16/2002, of July 1, of integrated prevention and control of pollution; the confidentiality and the technical capacity and responsibility of the author of environmental studies and documents. In relation to relations between administrations and as a consequence of the consideration of environmental assessment as an instrumental procedure with respect to the substantive procedure, it has been considered necessary to establish that the substantive body report to the environmental body of any incident occurring during the processing of the procedure for the adoption, approval or authorisation of a plan, programme or project which is relevant for the purposes of the processing of the environmental assessment procedures, particularly those involving the file or the expiration of the substantive procedure. This prevents the environmental organ from continuing with unnecessary processing. The primary obligation under the law is to submit to an appropriate environmental assessment any plan, programme or project which may have significant effects on the environment prior to its adoption, approval or the authorisation, or, where appropriate, in the case of projects, before the submission of a responsible statement or prior notice referred to in Article 71a of Law No 30/1992 of 26 November 1992 on the legal framework of the Public administrations and the Common Administrative Procedure. The legal consequence arising from the failure to comply with this obligation, expressly stated in the law itself, is that the acts of adoption, approval or approval of plans, programmes and projects, or in their the case, where appropriate, the responsible declaration or the prior communication relating to a project which, while falling within the scope of this law, has not been subject to an environmental assessment, without prejudice to the penalties which, where appropriate, may correspond. This preventive, essential and inherent aspect of the law is reinforced by the express mention of the legal consequences of the lack of delivery in environmental procedures-in coherence with the law and the law. Community and national case-law. In accordance with this regulation, the lack of issuance of the strategic environmental statement, the strategic environmental report, the environmental impact statement or the environmental impact report, within the legally established deadlines, in no Case may be understood to be equivalent to a favourable environmental assessment. The definitions have been set with the required level of detail and sufficient to clarify the concepts of the articulated. In order to facilitate their use, they have been divided into three sections: general definitions, definitions for the effects of the strategic environmental assessment and definitions for the effects of the environmental impact assessment. As a novelty, it should be noted that for the first time the legal nature of environmental procedures and environmental pronouncements is defined, in accordance with the established case law during the years of validity of this legislation. With regard to the former, the strategic environmental assessment and environmental impact assessment are described as "instrumental administrative procedure" with respect to the substantive and sectoral procedure of approval or adoption of the plans and programmes or the authorisation of the projects. For their part, the environmental statements, that is, the strategic environmental statement, the strategic environmental report, the environmental impact statement and the environmental impact report, have the legal nature of a mandatory and decisive report. The determining character of the environmental pronouncements is manifested in a double aspect, both formal and material. From the formal or procedural point of view, the determining character of the environmental pronouncements implies that it is not possible to continue the processing of the substantive procedure as long as it is not evacuated. From the material point of view, this is, as regards the linking of its content to the body that resolves, the determining character of a report assumes, in accordance with the recent case-law, that the report is necessary for the competent body to be able to decide on the issues to which the report itself refers. This determining character materializes in the mechanism provided for in this law for the resolution of discrepancies, so that the substantive organ is determined by the conditioning of the environmental pronouncements, which can be (a) to depart on the grounds of its own powers and to raise the relevant dispute before the Council of Ministers or the Governing Council of the relevant autonomous community, or, where appropriate, that the Community has determined. The environmental pronouncements in themselves will not be used, even if they will be, as it cannot be otherwise if the defensiveness is to be avoided, the pronouncements of the substantive organ under which it is approve or adopt the plans or programs or authorize the projects, in which the environmental pronouncements are incorporated. One of the essential pieces of environmental assessment is the consultation of the public administrations concerned. In order to avoid delays which have no justification from the environmental point of view and to ensure that the procedure is effective, the lack of delivery of the public authorities concerned cannot, in any way, slow down, and even less so. paralyse the procedure, which may continue as long as the environmental body has sufficient evidence to carry out the environmental assessment. In the event that the public authorities concerned do not issue their reports, or if they do not prove sufficient, the law provides that the environmental body requires the head of the authority's hierarchically superior body to it would have to issue the report, so that within ten days, from receipt of the request, the competent body would be instructed to deliver the relevant report within ten days, without prejudice to the responsibilities of the the person responsible for the delay and the possibility of the promoter of claiming to the Competent administration to issue the report, through the procedure provided for in Article 29.1 of Law 29/1998 of July 13, of the Jurisdiction-Administrative Jurisdiction. It is also remarkable that two procedures are designed for both the strategic environmental assessment and the environmental impact assessment: the ordinary and the simplified. The terminology used is widespread and consolidated in the autonomous communities and places the emphasis on the essentially procedural nature of the norm. The reasons which have led to this distinction are found in the Community directives themselves, which require an environmental assessment to be carried out prior to any plan, programme or project ' which may have significant effects. on the environment ". For certain types of plans, programmes or projects the directives establish the presumption iuris et de lure that they will in any case have significant effects on the environment and therefore need to be evaluated. prior to their approval, adoption or authorisation, in accordance with the ordinary procedure. For the remaining plans, programmes and projects, each Member State shall carry out an analysis either on a case-by-case basis, either by means of thresholds or by combining both techniques, in order to determine whether they have significant effects on the environment. This analysis is what has been called a simplified assessment procedure and if it is concluded that the plan, programme or project has significant effects on the environment, an ordinary assessment should be carried out. In this way, the correct compliance with the Community directives is ensured, in accordance with the interpretation made by the Court of Justice of the European Union. With regard to the maximum time limits, the following are established: regular strategic assessment: 22 months, renewable for two months longer for duly substantiated reasons; strategic environmental assessment simplified: four months; regular environmental impact assessment: four months, renewable for two more months for duly substantiated reasons; and simplified environmental impact assessment: three months. The scope of the law has not been changed substantially in relation to the laws which are now being repealed, since this area is clearly defined in the Community directives, so it does not has done more than maintain the transposition that was made of them. However, certain headings in Annexes I and II to the recast text of the Draft Environmental Impact Assessment Act, approved by the Royal Decree, have been incorporated in the field of application of this law. Legislative Decree 1/2008 of 11 January. It has also included the possibility that projects subject to a simplified environmental impact assessment will be subject to the ordinary procedure when requested by the sponsor. In terms of competences and administrative coordination, the law seeks to clarify some of the shared administrative actions foreseen in the previous legislation. On the relationship between the strategic environmental assessment and the environmental impact assessment, it should be noted that, in accordance with the Community directives, the first one does not exclude the second one, in such a way as to maintain the previous one. regulation. The article on the relationship between the environmental impact assessment and the integrated environmental authorization is also maintained, since this regulation is contained in Law 16/2002, of July 1, of integrated prevention and control of the pollution. As a novelty, the regulation of the confidentiality to be maintained by public administrations in relation to certain documentation provided by the promoter is included. In this way, many problems arising from requests for access to documents of procedures that have not yet been finalised will be solved by applying Law 27/2006 of 18 July on the rights of access to information, public participation and access to justice in the field of the environment. Finally, we include the requirement that the documents submitted by the promoters during the environmental assessment be carried out by persons who possess sufficient technical capacity, which will allow to maintain a high level of of the technical quality of these documents.

Legal Area
Renewable energy codes and standards – planning/environmental impact Market integrity and abuse Market regulatory coordination provisions
Cross-cutting Categories
-

Ttl Ii

 Title II
 is dedicated, in separate chapters, to the strategic environmental assessment and environmental impact assessment, establishing a basic regulation applicable to the entire territory of the State. with the savages set in the eighth final disposition, which determines the items that are not basic.
 Although the Community directives do not oblige, but with the provision that it will shortly be a Community mandate, and in any case to understand that it is an unavoidable reference, the law introduces the obligation to have in consideration of climate change, for which, as it cannot be otherwise, the information and techniques available at any time should be used.
 Regardless of whether the substantive body can resolve, in accordance with sectoral legislation, the mere formal inadmission of the application for adoption, approval or approval of the plan, programme or project if the The law also regulates a process of inadmission of a substantive or material character, which is intended for the promoters to know, from a very preliminary stage of the procedure, that they exist. well-founded reasons to understand that the plan, program or project will not be able to have a statement (a) environmental considerations, for environmental reasons, or where environmental studies do not meet sufficient quality conditions, or where an unfavourable environmental statement has been or has been issued in a plan, programme or project analogous to the one presented. This non-admission resolution declared by the environmental body concerns exclusively the application for the start of the environmental assessment-both strategic and impact, and both ordinary and simplified-and is given without prejudice to what is resolved. the substantive body, in accordance with the sectoral legislation, on the application for the adoption, approval or authorisation of the plan, programme or project.

Legal Area
Renewable energy codes and standards – planning/environmental impact
Cross-cutting Categories
-

Ttl Iii

 Title III
 regulates, in three separate chapters, the monitoring of plans and programmes and environmental impact statements, which are attributed to the substantive body, the sanctioning regime and the sanctioning procedure, incorporating technical improvements to overcome some of the deficiencies of the previous law.
 IV
 On the regime and the sanctioning procedure (Chapters II and III), this law regulates measures of a provisional nature, such as those which are necessary prior to the initiation of the sanctioning procedure, with the limits and conditions laid down in Article 72 of Law No 30/1992 of 26 November 1992 on the Legal Regime of Public Administrations and the Common Administrative Procedure. In addition, the regulation of the provision of compensation for damages in line with Law 26/2007 of 23 October on Environmental Liability is clarified. The final part consists of 15 additional provisions, two transitional provisions, one derogating provision and 11 final provisions. The additional provisions relate to: projects submitted to a responsible declaration; or prior communication; plans and programmes co-financed by the European Union; reporting obligations; relation of environmental assessment to other standards; concurrency and hierarchy of plans or programmes; infrastructure of state ownership; environmental assessment of state projects that may affect Natura 2000 sites; nature conservation banks; certificate of non-condition to the Natura 2000 network; periodic operations, accumulation of procedures environmental impact assessment; application of Law 30/1992, of 26 November, of the Legal Regime of Public Administrations and of the Common Administrative Procedure and electronic processing. Nature conservation banks are a voluntary mechanism to compensate, repair or restore the net loss of natural values, which will be the subject of regulatory development by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment. The credits generated in nature conservation banks will be entered in an official register under the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment and can be marketed under free conditions. market directly to: entities that require them in the field of any activity that produces an inevitable and irreparable net loss of natural values-especially in the case of compensatory measures of environmental impact Complementary and compensatory environmental damage compensation-entities without for profit; and the public administrations themselves. The final provision first serves the partial modification of the sanctioning regime included in Law 42/2007, of December 13, of Natural Heritage and Biodiversity. The law is accompanied by six annexes: the first and the second contain the relationship of projects that must be submitted, respectively, to an ordinary or simplified environmental impact assessment. To a large extent, the groups and project categories of the current legislation have been maintained, although technical improvements have been introduced and new typologies of projects have been incorporated to assess the use of new techniques, such as the hydraulic fracture. In addition, the content of the Directive has been adapted to the projects listed in the Annexes, so that projects which can actually have significant impacts on the environment will be subject to an ordinary environmental impact assessment. environment. The third Annex contains the criteria under which the environmental body should determine whether a project in Annex II is to be subject to an ordinary environmental assessment. The fourth annex details the content of the strategic environmental study; the fifth contains the criteria for etermining whether a plan or programme should be subject to an ordinary strategic environmental assessment. Finally, Annex VI details the content of the environmental impact study and the technical criteria for the interpretation of Annexes I and II. Finally, the Law introduces a series of modifications concerning the cross-basin transfers, in general, and in particular, to the operation of the Tajo-Segura transfer, thus adapting the specific rules on the Ta-Segura transfer to the general legislation of Spanish-born waters from 1985 onwards. And legal security is granted to the general system. In addition to legal certainty, a security and technical stability mechanism is established in order to order the government to update by real decree the determining measures of the transfer operating rule. This is necessary to adapt these measures in a flexible manner to the hydrological variations observed in recent years and to have agile instruments for adapting to possible effects of hydrological alteration such as those induced by climate change. Giving excessive rigidity to the system in these operational aspects can lead to undesirable effects that the intended mechanism allows to obviate. The modification, in depth, of the Water legislation that will have to establish, among other things, a new regime of cession of rights, that will have more efficiency in the future. Article 72 of the recast of the Water Law is partially modified at this time, with the aim of making its legal regime more flexible, without prejudice to the specific regulation of each transfer. It is also necessary that, in the near future, the regulation of transfers between territorial areas of different river basin management plans be incorporated into the National Hydrological Plan, as the text itself has Recast of the Law of Waters. And in this context, the next National Hydrological Plan Law will have to integrate, harmonize and update in a single normative block, the provisions concerning all the cross-basin transfers, which are scattered in different norms.

Legal Area
-
Cross-cutting Categories
-

Ttl I

 TITLE I
 - General principles and provisions

Legal Area
Integrated energy plan Renewable energy codes and standards – planning/environmental impact Tendering regulation Overall market principles Market integrity and abuse
Cross-cutting Categories
-

Ttl Ii

 TITLE II
 - Environmental Assessment

Legal Area
-
Cross-cutting Categories
-

Ttl Iii

 TITLE III
 - Tracking and sanctioning regime

Legal Area
Distribution and storage (electricity and other)
Cross-cutting Categories
-